2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the application of Jacobian-free Riemann solvers for relativistic radiation magnetohydrodynamics under M1 closure

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following a number of papers that studied RHD simulations of jet-massive wind interactions (Perucho & Bosch-Ramon 2008;Perucho et al 2010a;Perucho & Bosch-Ramon 2012), we run a set of dedicated three-dimensional numerical simulations using our new code LÓSTREGO, including the dynamical effects of magnetic fields (López-Miralles et al 2022). The results of these simulations showed that the latter could play a stabilizing role -and thus, to provide extra collimation within the binary scalein the jet evolution when the flux of magnetic energy is low compared with the flux of kinetic energy, while a non-negligible magnetic energy flux makes the jet prone to the development of current-driven instabilities within the scale of the binary.…”
Section: The Rmhd Simulations 321 Jet-stellar Wind Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Following a number of papers that studied RHD simulations of jet-massive wind interactions (Perucho & Bosch-Ramon 2008;Perucho et al 2010a;Perucho & Bosch-Ramon 2012), we run a set of dedicated three-dimensional numerical simulations using our new code LÓSTREGO, including the dynamical effects of magnetic fields (López-Miralles et al 2022). The results of these simulations showed that the latter could play a stabilizing role -and thus, to provide extra collimation within the binary scalein the jet evolution when the flux of magnetic energy is low compared with the flux of kinetic energy, while a non-negligible magnetic energy flux makes the jet prone to the development of current-driven instabilities within the scale of the binary.…”
Section: The Rmhd Simulations 321 Jet-stellar Wind Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perucho, Bosch-Ramon & Barkov 2017a), hydrogen ionization and recombination effects (e.g. Vaidya et al (2015), Perucho et al (2021), Perucho et al, in preparation) or radiation feedback (López-Miralles, Martí & Perucho 2023).…”
Section: The Rmhd Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…well; this is known as the two-moment scheme (Levermore 1984;Dubroca & Feugeas 1999). This approach has been applied in the context of neutron star merger (Wanajo et al 2014;Foucart et al 2015;Foucart et al 2016b;Foucart et al 2016a;Sekiguchi et al 2015;Radice et al 2022; see also the review by Foucart 2023), core-collapse supernovae (O'Connor 2015; Just et al 2015;Roberts et al 2016;Kuroda et al 2016;O'Connor & Couch 2018a;Skinner et al 2019;Laiu et al 2021;Santos-Pérez et al 2023; see also the review Mezzacappa et al 2020), black hole accretions (Zanotti et al 2011;Fragile et al 2012;Sądowski et al 2013;Fragile et al 2014;McKinney et al 2014;Takahashi et al 2016;Fragile et al 2018), and other purposes (González et al 2007;Commerçon et al 2011;Skinner & Ostriker 2013;Takahashi & Ohsuga 2013;Rivera-Paleo & Guzmán 2019;Melon Fuksman & Mignone 2019;Weih et al 2020b;Anninos & Fragile 2020;López-Miralles et al 2023) as well. Despite the recent progress of radiation transport modeling, the implementation of general-relativistic multispecies multigroup radiation magnetohydrodynamics codes, which include fully coupled radiation-matter interactions, is still not very common (but see a notable example Kuroda et al 2016), but is essential for astrophysics modeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%