Panel Methods in Fluid Mechanics With Emphasis on Aerodynamics 1988
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-663-13997-3_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Applicability of the Fredholm-Radon Method in Potential Theory and the Panel Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then u is a weak bounded solution of the third problem for the Laplace equation with the boundary condition µ. If c < 1 and (G) of (14). If there is µ ∈ C (G)…”
Section: Lipschitz Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Then u is a weak bounded solution of the third problem for the Laplace equation with the boundary condition µ. If c < 1 and (G) of (14). If there is µ ∈ C (G)…”
Section: Lipschitz Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(G) of the third problem (14). If u has the form (10), where c j = 0 for G j unbounded, then u is a weak solution of this third problem.…”
Section: Lipschitz Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since V B − βI is a Fredholm operator with index 0 by Lemma 5, [17], Satz 51.8, Satz 51.1, the spectral radius of the operator V B − αI is smaller than |α|. Therefore there are constants d α ∈ 1, ∞), q α ∈ (0, 1) such that the relation (22) holds for each g ∈ B(∂G) and an integer number n. Since V is invertible in B there is a unique f ∈ B(∂G) such that V f = g for each g ∈ B(∂G). Easy calculation yields that f given by the series (23) fulfils V f = g.…”
Section: Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each v £ #" we define the distribution 2fv by Assume G to be a domain with do(y) ^ 0 for every y € B and suppose that (5) inf -^ < 1. where n is a positive integer, vrij G #" and /js are bounded Baire functions on B. However in [33] an example is given of a rectangular domain G in IR 3 such that the condition (5) is not fulfilled even for A = 0. We shall substitute the condition (5) by a weaker condition and then we shall prove the result of [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%