2010
DOI: 10.1021/jp911277r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Anomalous Decomposition and Reactivity of Ammonium and Potassium Dinitramide

Abstract: Mechanistic pathways for the thermal decomposition of the solid-state energetic oxidizers ammonium dinitramide (ADN) and potassium dinitramide (KDN) have been deciphered by carefully considering previously performed experimental studies and using state of the art quantum chemical modeling of molecular clusters. Decomposition is governed by surface chemical processes, involving polarized (twisted) dinitramide anions of reduced stability. Under atmospheric and low-pressure conditions, the rate-determining step f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

5
32
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(137 reference statements)
5
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[6][7][8][9][10] However, the decomposition barrier for the free dinitramide anion (c.f. 1 in Scheme 1) has been theoretically estimated to be 47 kcal mol À1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[6][7][8][9][10] However, the decomposition barrier for the free dinitramide anion (c.f. 1 in Scheme 1) has been theoretically estimated to be 47 kcal mol À1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 in Scheme 1) has been theoretically estimated to be 47 kcal mol À1 . [9,10] The large barrier can be attributed to stabilization of the anion through considerable electronresonance delocalization. The actual real-life stability of 1 is strongly coupled to its ability to polarize charge, and its chemical environment has been shown to be of great importance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The barrier heights are underestimated by 8-11 kcal mol À1 compared to CBS-QB3 (extrapolated CCSD(T)) and SCS-MP2 calculations, which are in very good agreement. As we know from previous studies that B3LYP, B2PLYP, and highlevel ab initio methods (such as CCSD(T) and SCS-MP2) behave very similarly when treating N(NO 2 ) 2 À and its radical, [16] and, given the high accuracy of the latter methods, we can safely assume that the error by DFT stems from an overestimation of the TNA ground state energy. Thus, the limited interest in TNA might be caused by the wide use of B3LYP, which underestimates its stability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%