1930
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.mollus.a064002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Anatomy and Affinities of Plicatula

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is as yet no agreement on the closest outgroup for the Dimyidae, although there is general agreement that the family is related to the Prospondylidae Pchelinceva, 1960, Plicatulidae Watson, 1930, andAnomiidae Rafinesque, 1815, families that were placed in a new suborder Prospondyloidina by Waller in Waller and Stanley (2005, p. 47). Hautmann (2001aHautmann ( , 2004 provided evidence, based on the timing of evolutionary trends in alivincular-fossate ligament systems, that the Dimyidae and Plicatulidae probably evolved independently, the Plicatulidae from a prospondylid ancestor and the Dimyidae from a more remote pectinoid ancestry.…”
Section: Phylogenymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is as yet no agreement on the closest outgroup for the Dimyidae, although there is general agreement that the family is related to the Prospondylidae Pchelinceva, 1960, Plicatulidae Watson, 1930, andAnomiidae Rafinesque, 1815, families that were placed in a new suborder Prospondyloidina by Waller in Waller and Stanley (2005, p. 47). Hautmann (2001aHautmann ( , 2004 provided evidence, based on the timing of evolutionary trends in alivincular-fossate ligament systems, that the Dimyidae and Plicatulidae probably evolved independently, the Plicatulidae from a prospondylid ancestor and the Dimyidae from a more remote pectinoid ancestry.…”
Section: Phylogenymentioning
confidence: 99%