2004
DOI: 10.1215/s0012-7094-04-12413-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the analytical invariance of the semigroups of a quasi-ordinary hypersurface singularity

Abstract: We associate to any irreducible germ S of complex quasi-ordinary hypersurface an analytically invariant semigroup. We deduce a direct proof (without passing through their embedded topological invariance) of the analytical invariance of the normalized characteristic exponents. These exponents generalize the generic Newton-Puiseux exponents of plane curves. Incidentally, we give a toric description of the normalization morphism of the germ S.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The singular locus of a quasi-ordinary singularity is determined, after Lipman, by its characteristic exponents (see [24] and [34]). Definition 3.14.…”
Section: Definitions and Notationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The singular locus of a quasi-ordinary singularity is determined, after Lipman, by its characteristic exponents (see [24] and [34]). Definition 3.14.…”
Section: Definitions and Notationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppose that the reduced discriminant locus of the quasi-ordinary projection π has equation x 1 · · · x c = 0. The integer c is called in [34] the equisingular dimension of (S, 0), since (S, 0) may be viewed as a topologically equisingular deformation of a quasi-ordinary hypersurface germ of dimension c, but not smaller. See [2] and also Lipman's work [27].…”
Section: Quasi-ordinary Singularitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(See [12].) Make the Euclidean division of g by f (i) , by induction we get the f (i) -adic representation of g which is of the form g = c l i (f (i) ) l i .…”
Section: Proposition 33 If the Sequence Of Distinguished Exponents mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This gives us the claimed adic representation. The uniqueness comes from the fact that the Y -degrees of the terms c l 0 ···l i (f (0) ) l 0 · · · (f (i) ) l i are pairwise distinct (see Lemma 7.2 of [12]). The only thing which remains to prove is the inequality 0 l i n i+1 − 1.…”
Section: Proposition 33 If the Sequence Of Distinguished Exponents mentioning
confidence: 99%