2012 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Services Computing 2012
DOI: 10.1109/scc.2012.66
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Analysis of Satisfaction for Web Services Selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thereafter, we measure the average output performance of tasks in communities following different methods. Figure 4 depicts the results of optimal -core, Depth-1 Convex-Checker, Depth-2 Convex-Checker, 3-Way Satisfaction [7], and 2 Player Non-Cooperative [8] methods in one grand community with many web services scenario. For -core, we assign to 15% of total community worth, = 0.15 × v(C), which allows subsets of the coalition to gain maximum 15% of v(C).…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thereafter, we measure the average output performance of tasks in communities following different methods. Figure 4 depicts the results of optimal -core, Depth-1 Convex-Checker, Depth-2 Convex-Checker, 3-Way Satisfaction [7], and 2 Player Non-Cooperative [8] methods in one grand community with many web services scenario. For -core, we assign to 15% of total community worth, = 0.15 × v(C), which allows subsets of the coalition to gain maximum 15% of v(C).…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this direction, recently [7], [8] proposed mechanisms to help users and services maximize their gain. A two-player non-cooperative game between web services and community master was introduced in [8].…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [4,17], the historical QoS records are recruited to evaluate the trust of web service, by comparing the historical QoS data with the SLA promised by service providers. In [18], the service is evaluated by considering its historical QoS records.…”
Section: B Related Work and Comparison Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are so many web services that share the same or similar functionality [1][2][3] on the Internet, it becomes a necessity to evaluate and rank all the functional-qualified candidate services, based on their QoS (Quality of Service) information. However, due to the reasons of unstable network running environment or the exaggerated propaganda, the QoS information advertised by service providers is not always trusted [4][5], which blocks a user from selecting a trusted web service.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%