2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2012.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the analysis of bubble growth and detachment at low Capillary and Bond numbers using Volume of Fluid and Level Set methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The boundary of the bubble was then detected by means of bubble isolation. According to the authors (Albadawi et al, 2013b), this isolation method results in an uncertainty in detecting the bubble boundary of ±one pixel, which corresponds to a value of ±0.0134 mm.…”
Section: Problem Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The boundary of the bubble was then detected by means of bubble isolation. According to the authors (Albadawi et al, 2013b), this isolation method results in an uncertainty in detecting the bubble boundary of ±one pixel, which corresponds to a value of ±0.0134 mm.…”
Section: Problem Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this point it should be mentioned that initial trial simulations verified that imposing angles lower than 20°does not influence significantly the bubble detachment characteristics, and the interface between the two phases remains attached to the orifice during the entire process of the bubble growth. Here the value of 20°was selected in order for the interface to stay pinned at the orifice as observed in the proposed experiments (Albadawi et al, 2013b). The initial conditions that are used for the considered numerical validation case, imitating the corresponding experimental conditions are summarised in Table 1 (Case 1).…”
Section: Computational Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The period-1 dripping regime with or without satellite drop formation, [43][44][45][46] period-1 to complex dripping [47][48][49] (period doubling bifurcations, chaos, and hysteresis) to jetting, [48][49][50] and the transitions among different regimes have been discussed in detail. [47][48][49][50][51] In addition to the experimental and theoretical investigations, numerical simulations of bubble formation processes have been carried out using the boundary integral method (BIM), [32][33][34][35]52 volume-of-fluid method, 53 level-set method, 54 coupled level-set and volume-of-fluid (CLSVOF) method, [55][56][57][58][59][60] and front tracking method. 61 Oguz and Prosperetti, 32 Higuera and Medina, 35 and Gordillo et al 52 studied the bubble formation process from an orifice in a quiescent inviscous liquid at high Reynolds numbers by means of the potential flow approximation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 A simple VOF coupled with level set (LS) method (S-CLSVOF) for improving surface tension was proposed and tested compared to a standard VOF solver and experimental observations. 17,18 A three-dimensional (3D) code was developed, 19 where interface tracking was performed by a LS method, and the ghost fluid method was used to capture sharp discontinuities accurately; the LS and VOF methods were coupled to ensure mass conservation. 20 Arnaud et al 21 did a simulation of the jet breakup in biphasic conditions; results reveal that in the range of investigated Reynolds and Ohnesorge numbers, the classical criteria used to distinguish the different modes of jet breakup at atmospheric pressure seems to be valid for the highpressure environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%