2015
DOI: 10.1070/sm2015v206n01abeh004448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the analogues of Szegő's theorem for ergodic operators

Abstract: Szegő's theorem on the asymptotic behaviour of the determinants of large Toeplitz matrices is generalized to the class of ergodic operators. The generalization is formulated in terms of a triple consisting of an ergodic operator and two functions, the symbol and the test function. It is shown that in the case of the one-dimensional discrete Schrödinger operator with random ergodic or quasiperiodic potential and various choices of the symbol and the test function this generalization leads to asymptotic formulae… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(66) This means that A ≃ M M S with the natural isomorphism E α ij [A] ↔ F α ij [A]. Then, comparing (14)-(16) and (64)-(65) (with MS instead of M) we deduce that π in (16) is the isomorphism satisfying (17)-(18). Now, let us prove Theoem 1.3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…(66) This means that A ≃ M M S with the natural isomorphism E α ij [A] ↔ F α ij [A]. Then, comparing (14)-(16) and (64)-(65) (with MS instead of M) we deduce that π in (16) is the isomorphism satisfying (17)-(18). Now, let us prove Theoem 1.3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In this part of the proof we work with the non-averaged quantities Tr (h(g(H) G )) as long as possible. For a concrete model such as the random Anderson model, and additional (model-specific) assumptions, the pointwise formula (4.27) would be the starting point for an almost sure pointwise or stochastic asymptotic analysis beyond the results from [KP15]. In the second part we then apply Theorem 2.5 to show that the coefficients A m are well-defined for q > 2d and that there exist constants C, C ′ such that…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 26mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For M ∈ N Tr (h(W L (a)))) = Recently, subleading-order trace asymptotics as in (1.3)-(1.5) have been studied for Schrödinger operators with non-trivial potential [PS14, KP15, EPS17, PS] that fit in the larger class of ergodic operators. For a, say, Z d -ergodic and selfadjoint operator ω → H ω on L 2 (R d ), a natural generalization for the left-hand side of (1.5) is the trace of the operator h(g(H ω ) [−L,L] d ) for a suitable function g. In [KP15] such trace asymptotics were studied for one-dimensional random and quasiperiodic Schrödinger operators on the lattice. For the random Anderson model and concrete choices of functions g, h the authors showed that the leading order term, which is of order L, obeys a central limit theorem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, recent literature contains asymptotic formulae for a generalised version of the trace : the operator A is replaced by a(H) where H=Δ+V is a Schrödinger operator with a real‐valued potential V and a:RR is a bounded function, for instance a step function. Here, the focus lies on (random) ergodic potentials in and periodic potentials in .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%