2012
DOI: 10.1037/a0028892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the adequacy of Bayesian evaluations of categorization models: Reply to Vanpaemel and Lee (2012).

Abstract: This is the accepted version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On these grounds we will prioritize global qualitative analysis over local quantitative analysis. (Wills and Pothos, 2012a;2012b) have convincingly argued that relative adequacy, defined in terms of the number and proportion of irreversible, ordinal successes, might be a useful metrics for model evaluation and comparison. Central to their approach is the concept of irreversible success, that is, success in the absence of arbitrarily variable free parameters.…”
Section: Qualitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On these grounds we will prioritize global qualitative analysis over local quantitative analysis. (Wills and Pothos, 2012a;2012b) have convincingly argued that relative adequacy, defined in terms of the number and proportion of irreversible, ordinal successes, might be a useful metrics for model evaluation and comparison. Central to their approach is the concept of irreversible success, that is, success in the absence of arbitrarily variable free parameters.…”
Section: Qualitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%