2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the accuracy of internal wave generation method in a non-hydrostatic wave model to generate and absorb dispersive and directional waves

Abstract: The weakly reflective wave generation is a wave generation and absorption method in phase-resolving models, based on the assumption that the waves propagating towards the wave generation boundary are small amplitude shallow water waves with direction perpendicular to the boundary. This assumption makes the method weakly reflective for dispersive and directional waves. The internal wave generation method was proposed by Vasarmidis et al. (2019b) as an alternative, for the non-hydrostatic wave model, SWASH, to a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 5, the present results are also compared with the results in Vasarmidis et al [27], who replicated the same experiment using the non-hydrostatic wave model SWASH, and the numerical results in Raoult et al [30], who drew a comparison only in Transect T4. The numerical results of both models seem to predict the experimental measurements quite satisfactorily; however, the present study's results seem to be even more accurate especially in transects T2 and T3.…”
Section: Waves Propagation Over An Elliptical Shoalmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Figure 5, the present results are also compared with the results in Vasarmidis et al [27], who replicated the same experiment using the non-hydrostatic wave model SWASH, and the numerical results in Raoult et al [30], who drew a comparison only in Transect T4. The numerical results of both models seem to predict the experimental measurements quite satisfactorily; however, the present study's results seem to be even more accurate especially in transects T2 and T3.…”
Section: Waves Propagation Over An Elliptical Shoalmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…To validate the present numerical model, two benchmark cases of regular waves were selected to demonstrate the ability of the model to simulate complex 3D wave transformations due to the simultaneous effects of wave refraction and diffraction. This experiment has also been reproduced by 2D depth-integrated, non-hydrostatic models for the simulation of coastal waves over varying bathymetries [25][26][27]. It should be noted that the performance of the above mentioned models was good, but they underestimated the wave height behind the shoal.…”
Section: Waves Propagation Over An Elliptical Shoalmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…A sponge layer with a width of 100 m is used at the end of the domain to dissipate the wave energy. Internal wave generation [21,29] is not used, since the reflection from the structure is very limited for very oblique and parallel wave cases. For the oblique wave cases, the reflection cannot be ignored, but the re-reflection from the offshore wave generation boundary has no influence on the overtopping geometrically.…”
Section: Swash Model Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dimensions of the numerical domain were chosen to minimise the influence of side-wall reflections. For the long-crested diffraction and response simulations, the model domain spanned 700 m × 416 m. Waves were generated at the western boundary using a source function (Vasarmidis et al, 2019(Vasarmidis et al, , 2020. To minimise the influence of re-reflections, sponge layers were positioned along all boundaries of the domain (see Fig.…”
Section: Moored Floating Cylinder In Open Watermentioning
confidence: 99%