1997
DOI: 10.1029/97jc00049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the accuracy of HF radar surface current measurements: Intercomparisons with ship‐based sensors

Abstract: Abstract. High-frequency (HF) radar systems can provide periodic, two-dimensional, vector current estimates over an area approaching 1000 km •. As the use of these HF systems has gained wider acceptance, a number of attempts have been made to estimate the accuracy of such systems. However, comparisons of HF radar current estimates with in situ sensors are difficult to interpret since HF systems measure currents averaged over an area of-1 km 2 and to a depth of only -50 cm while in situ sensors measure currents… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
108
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
108
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Only the radial component maps were taken into consideration, and not the current vectors that can be deduced by the geometric combination of the two sets of radar measurements. The first reason for this choice is to prevent the introduction of the geometric dilution of precision, which is inherent in the vector mapping process (Chapman et al, 1997). The second reason is to dispose of the most extended observation area and to avoid wasting valid observations.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only the radial component maps were taken into consideration, and not the current vectors that can be deduced by the geometric combination of the two sets of radar measurements. The first reason for this choice is to prevent the introduction of the geometric dilution of precision, which is inherent in the vector mapping process (Chapman et al, 1997). The second reason is to dispose of the most extended observation area and to avoid wasting valid observations.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The normal component is poorly constrained near the baseline between two sites and the azimuthal component is poorly constrained far from the sites, yielding a Geometric Dilution Of Precision (GDOP [Chapman et al, 1997]). It can be estimated as follows [Gurgel, 1994;D.…”
Section: Appendix A: Vector Currents Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dilution Of Precision (GDOP, Chapman et al, 1997) is at the origin of systematic low reliability of velocity vectors at the edge of the observed domain, as well as along the baseline connecting receiving antennas. The accuracy of the total vector maps also depends on the number of radial velocities from each radar site involved in the combination process, known as Geometrical Dilution Of Statistical Accuracy (GDOSA, Barrick, 2002).…”
Section: Basic Principles Of Hfr Operation and Data Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%