2014
DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2014.959656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the accuracy of Blue Chip forecasts of interest rates and country risk premiums

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with the theory, empirical findings are mixed for the survey forecasts of short-term interest rates. For instance, Baghestani, Arzaghi, and Kaya (2015) examine the accuracy of the Blue Chip survey forecasts of 3-month Euro currency rates and 10-year government bond rates for the Eurozone, Australia, Canada, Japan, Switzerland, the UK, and the US for 1999-2008. They find that nearly half of the short-term interest rate forecasts are superior to the random walk.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with the theory, empirical findings are mixed for the survey forecasts of short-term interest rates. For instance, Baghestani, Arzaghi, and Kaya (2015) examine the accuracy of the Blue Chip survey forecasts of 3-month Euro currency rates and 10-year government bond rates for the Eurozone, Australia, Canada, Japan, Switzerland, the UK, and the US for 1999-2008. They find that nearly half of the short-term interest rate forecasts are superior to the random walk.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regulators who authorize a future test year, in which utility rates are set based on expected, not historical, costs, could mitigate some of the impacts by reflecting the inflationary aspects that typically accompany rising interest rates. However, forecasting changes to long-term interest rates themselves over a future test year lacks a solid financial basis since interest rate changes cannot be predicted with any degree of accuracy, even by financial experts (Baghestani et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following a standard approach in the context of forecast evaluation (see, e.g., Beechey & Österholm, ; as well as Baghestani, Arzaghi, & Kaya, ), we start our empirical analysis with the test for unbiasedness, followed by the sign accuracy test and the test for forecast encompassing. In a second step, we apply widely acknowledged forecast accuracy measures.…”
Section: Methodologies Of Forecast Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By applying the sign accuracy test, we investigate the directional accuracy of the forecasts provided (see, e.g., Baghestani, ; Baghestani et al, ; Diebold & Lopez, ; Greer, ; Kolb & Stekler, ; Mitchell & Pearce, 2006; as well as Spiwoks, Bedke, & Hein, ). Following—for example—Spiwoks et al (), we first use a 2‐by‐2 contingency table.…”
Section: Methodologies Of Forecast Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%