2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2005.03.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the 27-day variations of the galactic cosmic ray anisotropy and intensity for different periods of solar magnetic cycle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…short or long period variations). Vernova et al (2003), Alania et al (2005), and Gil et al (2005) demonstrated that the amplitudes of the 27-day variation of the GCR intensity do not depend on the tilt angle (TA) of the HCS. Therefore, we can consider the HCS as a plane with TA = 0, i.e., the heliosphere is divided into two symmetric parts (hemispheres) by the HCS coinciding with the Sun's equatorial plane.…”
Section: Model Of the 27-day Variation Of The Gcr Intensity; Results mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…short or long period variations). Vernova et al (2003), Alania et al (2005), and Gil et al (2005) demonstrated that the amplitudes of the 27-day variation of the GCR intensity do not depend on the tilt angle (TA) of the HCS. Therefore, we can consider the HCS as a plane with TA = 0, i.e., the heliosphere is divided into two symmetric parts (hemispheres) by the HCS coinciding with the Sun's equatorial plane.…”
Section: Model Of the 27-day Variation Of The Gcr Intensity; Results mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where H is the Heaviside step function changing the sign of the global magnetic field in each hemisphere, Subsequent papers (Alania et al, 2001b;Alania et al, 2005;Gil et al, 2005) show the results that the amplitudes of the 27-day variations of the GCR intensity and anisotropy do not depend on the tilt angles of the HNS during the 11-year cycle of solar activity. It is acceptable to use the planar HNS in modeling of the 27-day variation of the GCR intensity.…”
Section: Model Of the 27-day Variation Of The Gcr Intensity And Its Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, Alania et al, (2001aAlania et al, ( , 2001b; Gil and Alania (2001); Vernova et al, (2003); Iskra et al, (2004) demonstrated that the amplitudes of the 27-day variation of the GCR intensity obtained from neutron monitors are greater in the minimum epochs of solar activity for A>0 than for A<0. Recently, we demonstrated Modzelewska 2008a, 2008b;Gil et al, 2005) that also the amplitudes of the 27-day variation of the GCR anisotropy at solar minimum are greater when A>0 than when A<0. Many of the papers (Gil and Alania, 2001;Burger and Hitge, 2004;Alania et al, 2005;Gil et al, 2005;Modzelewska 2008a, 2008b;Burger et al, 2008) aimed to explain a dependence of the 27-day variation of the cosmic ray intensity on the A>0 and A<0 polarity epochs in terms of drift effect for the same heliolongitudinal changes of the solar wind velocity in different polarity epochs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The structure is more complex during the long time period. Transport models (Gil et al, 2005) and measurements analyzed in paper (Richardson, 2004) suggest the dependence on solar magnetic field polarity. Vivek Gupta and Badruddin, (2009) found that the average behavior of GCR-oscillations during Carrington rotation is different in A > 0 from that in A < 0 epoch.…”
Section: Periodic and Quasi-periodic Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%