2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On testing for spatial correspondence between maps of human brain structure and function

Abstract: A critical issue in many neuroimaging studies is the comparison between brain maps. Nonetheless, it remains unclear how one should test hypotheses focused on the overlap or spatial correspondence between two or more brain maps. This "correspondence problem" affects, for example, the interpretation of comparisons between task-based patterns of functional activation, resting-state networks or modules, and neuroanatomical landmarks. To date, this problem has been addressed with remarkable variability in terms of … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
651
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 472 publications
(660 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
8
651
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We used multiple linear regressions to evaluate the variance explained in externopyramidisation and cell-type specific expression by the two structural manifold eigenvectors. Significance values were corrected to account for spatial autocorrelation in the eigenvectors using spin testing and Moran spectral randomisation, respectively 116,117 , and was operationalised using BrainSpace 92 . Spectral randomisation was initialised using the geodesic distance matrix.…”
Section: Externopyramidisation = Max( ) Mean( ) × 1 − ℎ ℎmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used multiple linear regressions to evaluate the variance explained in externopyramidisation and cell-type specific expression by the two structural manifold eigenvectors. Significance values were corrected to account for spatial autocorrelation in the eigenvectors using spin testing and Moran spectral randomisation, respectively 116,117 , and was operationalised using BrainSpace 92 . Spectral randomisation was initialised using the geodesic distance matrix.…”
Section: Externopyramidisation = Max( ) Mean( ) × 1 − ℎ ℎmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we examined the relationship between level of laminar differentiation and adolescent development of MT moments. To assess the relative over-or underrepresentation of significant regions per laminar class we generated 10,000 spin permutations of the t-maps, which controls for spatial contiguity and hemispheric symmetry across permutations 21,32,44 . Specifically, we differently rotated the t-maps 10,000 times and for each permutation of this spin or rotation we computed counts per laminar class that passed a false discovery rate (FDR) correction for multiple comparisons 62 to create a null-distribution of the counts table.…”
Section: Longitudinal Assessment Of Age-related Changes In Mt Momentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explore how compression efficiency might relate to patterns of cortical myelination and areal scaling, we assessed the Spearman's correlation coefficient between myelination or scaling and send or receive compression efficiency. To further test correspondence between brain maps, we used a spatial permutation test, which generates a null distribution of randomly rotated brain maps that preserve the spatial covariance structure of the original data [79]. We refer to the p-value of this statistical test as p SP IN .…”
Section: Compression Efficiency and Patterns Of Neurodevelopmentmentioning
confidence: 99%