On symbolism in Proclus’ Commentary on Plato’s 'Timaeus'

Kurdybaylo, Dmitry

doi:10.21146/2072-0726-2019-12-2-144-159

2019

DOI: 10.21146/2072-0726-2019-12-2-144-159

|View full text |Cite

On symbolism in Proclus’ Commentary on Plato’s 'Timaeus'

Dmitry Kurdybaylo¹

Abstract: Исследование выполнено за счет гранта Российского научного фонда (проект № 17-78-10061) в Русской христианской гуманитарной академии (Санкт-Петербург).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2019

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

On symbolon and synthēma in the Platonic Theology of Proclus

Kurdybaylo

2019

Schole

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many recent studies propose that symbolon and synthēma are synonymous in the writings of Proclus. However, his Platonic Theology contains reliable evidence to put this opinion to doubt. The goal of this research is to determine the meaning of both terms from the contexts of their usage, engaging the textual analysis and the following philosophical reconstruction. As distinguished from a symbol, a synthēma has substantial nature, is stable and remains invariable when is discovered at different levels of the ontological hierarchy. In the Platonic Theology, a symbol is often considered in terms of the hierarchic level, where it appears: in the material world, it is corporeal; among numbers, it is ontologically irrelevant, the intelligible realm contains its proper symbols as well. A significant difference between symbolon and synthēma is related to the dialectics of participation: synthēma in an object keeps it on an unparticipated level, while a symbol implies further participation to a symbolic object. Finally, a synthēma is described as "disseminated," "planted," or in any other way hidden in the being; while a symbol is "discovered," or found in the being, therefore synthēma may be considered an inner kernel of what is discovered as a symbol, and a symbolas an outward expression of a synthēma. Such understanding of these terms agrees with both exegetical and theurgic contexts in Proclus' Platonic Theology.

show abstract

On symbolon and synthēma in the Platonic Theology of Proclus

Kurdybaylo

2019

Schole

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

On symbolism in Proclus’ Commentary on Plato’s 'Timaeus'

Abstract: Исследование выполнено за счет гранта Российского научного фонда (проект № 17-78-10061) в Русской христианской гуманитарной академии (Санкт-Петербург).

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

On symbolon and synthēma in the Platonic Theology of Proclus

On symbolon and synthēma in the Platonic Theology of Proclus

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About