2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00200-021-00534-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On symbol-pair distances of repeated-root constacyclic codes of length $$2p^s$$ over $${\mathbb {F}}_{p^m}+u{\mathbb {F}}_{p^m}$$ and MDS symbol-pair codes

Abstract: Let ℜ = p m + u p m with u 2 = 0 , where m, s are positive integers and p is an odd prime. For any invertible element of ℜ , the symbol-pair distances of all -constacyclic codes of length 2p s over ℜ are completely obtained. We identify all symbolpair Maximum Distance Separable (MDS) constacyclic codes of length 2p s over ℜ . As examples, many new symbol-pair codes, as well as symbol-pair MDS codes are constructed. Keywords Repeated-root codes • Symbol-pair MDS codes • Finite chain rings • Constacyclic codes •… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not difficult to see e 2 = e ande * = 2 • 2g 2 + 2 • g 4 + 2 • 2 • g 6 + 2 • g 8 + 2 = e.So, by Proposition 5.2, the code C generated by e is a LCD code of dimension of dimension 8 and weight 2 which are exactly the parameters of the best[10,8] code known.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is not difficult to see e 2 = e ande * = 2 • 2g 2 + 2 • g 4 + 2 • 2 • g 6 + 2 • g 8 + 2 = e.So, by Proposition 5.2, the code C generated by e is a LCD code of dimension of dimension 8 and weight 2 which are exactly the parameters of the best[10,8] code known.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…When λ = 1, we have so called cyclic codes and, when λ = −1, we have negacyclic codes. Thus, constacyclic codes are generalization of cyclic and negacyclic codes and they have been studied for many authors ( [1], [2], [8]). Also, constacyclic codes can be realized as ideals in polinomial factor ring R[x]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%