2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4149(02)00232-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On swapping and simulated tempering algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they do capture some important qualitative features of more complex and more realistic models, and for this reason increase our optimism that the swapping method is efficient for wider classes of problems. Our intuition is also supported by Zheng [29,30], who proves that in fairly general situations the spectral gap of the simulated tempering chain is bounded below by a multiple of the gap of the associated swapping chain.…”
Section: J͒ Where Z Is the Normalizing Constant Observe That Assupporting
confidence: 67%
“…However, they do capture some important qualitative features of more complex and more realistic models, and for this reason increase our optimism that the swapping method is efficient for wider classes of problems. Our intuition is also supported by Zheng [29,30], who proves that in fairly general situations the spectral gap of the simulated tempering chain is bounded below by a multiple of the gap of the associated swapping chain.…”
Section: J͒ Where Z Is the Normalizing Constant Observe That Assupporting
confidence: 67%
“…We will show that our overlap quantity δ(A) is bounded below by the overlap used in Madras and Randall [14] and Zheng [29], and that our definition is equal to theirs in the case of π symmetric (as defined in Section 4.1).…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Due to our experience with more advanced single chain MCMC methods (such as tempered transitions (Neal 1996) and delayed rejection (Green and Mira 2001); see Jasra et al 2005a for examples), it seems clear that alternative methods are needed. Note that one single chain method, simulated tempering (Marinari and Parisi 1992;Geyer and Thompson 1995), can perform better than some population MCMC schemes discussed below (see Zheng 2003), if the pseudo prior can be estimated accurately (this is typically a high dimensional integral which can be estimated on the fly using stochastic approximation; see Atchadé and Liu 2004). However, in some of the applications for which population methods are required (e.g.…”
Section: Example: Mixture Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%