2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4949080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-sun first operation of a 150 kWth pilot solar receiver using dense particle suspension as heat transfer fluid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several studies suggesting different designs for particle receivers [14,18,21,26,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. Nonetheless, there are some receivers more developed that can be categorized as shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Solar Receivermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are several studies suggesting different designs for particle receivers [14,18,21,26,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. Nonetheless, there are some receivers more developed that can be categorized as shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Solar Receivermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solid particles are forced upward through the irradiated tubes by airflow increasing the heat transfer between the tube walls and the solid particles [14]. Both, single a multiple tube experiments have been reported and compared with fluidized direct receiver [11,41,53].…”
Section: Fluidized Indirect Receivermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Sandia National Laboratory in the United States proposed solid particles as heat absorption and transfer media of concentrating solar power in the 1980s, researchers carried out many experiments and numerical simulation studies on SPSR from the aspects of receiver structure, particle types, characteristic parameters, and flow characteristics (Hruby et al, 1984;Clifford, 2016;Lopez et al, 2016;Sharaf et al, 2019;Li et al, 2020;Marianne et al, 2021). Wang et al (2017) carried out dynamic thermal performance experiments on a falling particle receiver of a single quartz tube and found that particle diameter, particle inlet temperature, particle flow, and type of quartz tube had a significant influence on the temperature of particles at the outlet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particle loss is a common disadvantage in direct radiation SPSR systems [5] that causes various indirect radiation SPSR systems to be proposed. In this context, Lopez et al (2016) [7] performed a test using a fluidized bed solar receiver. In this test, solid particles were used in 16 upstream tubes, and thermal efficiency o f 52-90% an d average temperature of 137-335 °C/m were obtained at a radiation intensity of 63-142 kW/m 2 and a mass flux of 17-44 kg/m 2 -s. Benoit et al [8] tested the particle-wall heat transfer coefficient in a me tal tu be flu idized bed rec eiver and found that the results ranged from 400-1000 W/m 2 -K. Johnson et al (2016) [9] presented a particle-filled receiver model with particles flowing down in a vertical steel tube.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%