1963
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1963)002<0191:ospf>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Subjective Probability Forecasting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
115
0
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
115
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The ideal forecast is the sharpest of all auto-calibrated forecasts, because it is characterized by the maximal expected score. This fact is seen from the classical partitioning of the Brier score for dichotomous outcomes into the sum of sharpness and calibration ("validity") terms developed in Sanders (1963). For an auto-calibrated forecast the calibration term is zero.…”
Section: Testing Vs Scoring Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ideal forecast is the sharpest of all auto-calibrated forecasts, because it is characterized by the maximal expected score. This fact is seen from the classical partitioning of the Brier score for dichotomous outcomes into the sum of sharpness and calibration ("validity") terms developed in Sanders (1963). For an auto-calibrated forecast the calibration term is zero.…”
Section: Testing Vs Scoring Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; K, where K is the total number of categories. Then the calibration index (CI) is given by (Murphy, 1973;Sanders, 1963):…”
Section: Murphy Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes it reasonable to use MSE or LogLoss as measures to evaluate calibration methods, since the 'separability components' are not affected. This is clearly seen through the so-called "decompositions of the Brier score" (Sanders, 1963;Murphy, 1972) included in a previous section in this chapter.…”
Section: Calibration Methods For Type Cpmentioning
confidence: 78%