1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf01388909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On subgroups ofGL n (F p )

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to understand subgroups of GL,(Fp), where Fp is the prime field with p elements. To explain our results we need a few simple definitions.Let G be a subgroup of GL, (Fp). Let X = {x~GlxV= l }. Denote by (~ the (connected) algebraic subgroup of GL,, defined over Fv, generated by the oneparameter subgroups t~-*xt= exp (t log x) for all xeX. The (normal) subgroup of G generated by X is denoted by G +.Our main result (see Theorem B, w 3) says that if the prime p is greater than some constan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
131
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
131
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The claims in the proposition are trivial if p is bounded. For the proof, we shall assume that p is large enough, and so we can use the results of [18]. Also, the first statement clearly follows from the second, so we prove the second claim.…”
Section: Euler Factorizationmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The claims in the proposition are trivial if p is bounded. For the proof, we shall assume that p is large enough, and so we can use the results of [18]. Also, the first statement clearly follows from the second, so we prove the second claim.…”
Section: Euler Factorizationmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Subgroups of GL n (F p ). We review some definitions from [18], and advise the reader to have a copy in hand. We fix a prime number p and a natural number p > n. Let Υ be a subgroup of GL n (F p ).…”
Section: Euler Factorizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their proof makes use of the classification of finite simple groups. The treatment of this theorem in [48] does not make use of this classification. To see that part (iii) is true, choose q 1 with q 0 |q 1 and M|q 1 , and so that the following holds: the center Z of G is finite and for p large enough G(F p )/Z(F p ) are distinct finite simple groups.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following result follows from work of Weisfeiler [13] or Nori [10]. For a proof in this setting, see Theorem 2.6 of [6].…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 92%