2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2011.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On strong ergodicity and chaoticity of systems with the asymptotic average shadowing property

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an application, it is shown that for a continuous semi-flow θ on a compact metric space E with the AASP, if the almost periodic points of θ are dense in E then θ is syndetically sensitive. Consequently, by our results obtained in this paper we can easily see that the semi-flow versions of Theorem 3.1 in [40] and Proposition 1, Theorem 1, and Corollary 1 in [39] are true. Also, Theorem 3.5 is stronger than the semi-flow version of Theorem 3.1 in [40], Lemma 3.4 is stronger than the semi-flow versions of Proposition 3.3 from [40] in the case that f = g, and Lemma 3.2 is the semi-flow versions of Lemma 3.2 from [40] in the case that f = g. Moreover, inspired by [18] and [20] we show that for any semi-flow θ ∈ C 0 (R + × E, E) on a compact metric space (E, d), it has the AASP if and only if so does its inverse limit ( E, θ), and if and only if so does its lifting continuous semi-flow ( E, θ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…As an application, it is shown that for a continuous semi-flow θ on a compact metric space E with the AASP, if the almost periodic points of θ are dense in E then θ is syndetically sensitive. Consequently, by our results obtained in this paper we can easily see that the semi-flow versions of Theorem 3.1 in [40] and Proposition 1, Theorem 1, and Corollary 1 in [39] are true. Also, Theorem 3.5 is stronger than the semi-flow version of Theorem 3.1 in [40], Lemma 3.4 is stronger than the semi-flow versions of Proposition 3.3 from [40] in the case that f = g, and Lemma 3.2 is the semi-flow versions of Lemma 3.2 from [40] in the case that f = g. Moreover, inspired by [18] and [20] we show that for any semi-flow θ ∈ C 0 (R + × E, E) on a compact metric space (E, d), it has the AASP if and only if so does its inverse limit ( E, θ), and if and only if so does its lifting continuous semi-flow ( E, θ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In [8,10], the authors claimed that ϕ has the asymptotic average shadowing property. But, in [12] Niu and Su explained that x = 0 is a distal point for ϕ and consequently this result is false. Now, we consider a similar map that has the asymptotic average shadowing property.…”
Section: Example 34mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Niu and Su proved that, if f is point distal then f does not have the asymptotic average shadowing property [12].…”
Section: Example 34mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,19 AASP has been studied by many authors. 3,4,7 Recently, distributional chaos in the system with specification property has been fully investigated. 2,8,9,13,16 The latest result is that a system with specification property must display dense uniformly distributional chaos, and exhibit dense invariant uniformly distributional chaos provided it has a fixed point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%