2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2020.08.005
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On strategy-proofness and semilattice single-peakedness

Abstract: We study social choice rules defined on the domain of semilattice singlepeaked preferences. Semilattice single-peakedness has been identified as the necessary condition that a set of preferences must satisfy so that the set can be the domain of a strategy-proof, tops-only, anonymous and unanimous rule. We characterize the class of all such rules on that domain and show that they are deeply related to the supremum of the underlying semilattice structure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is an anonymous, tops-only and strategy-proof rule. The characterization of all anonymous, tops-only and strategy-proof rules on the semi-single-peaked domain can be established according to Theorem 1 of Bonifacio and Massó (2020). 27 Although Statement (ii) of the Theorem is an impossibility statement for designing, its proof shows that an (a, b)-semi-hybrid domain D on a tree T A admits the following tops-only and strategy-proof rule, called the hybrid rule: given a voter i ∈ N , for all P ∈ D n ,…”
Section: A Classification Of Non-dictatorial Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…is an anonymous, tops-only and strategy-proof rule. The characterization of all anonymous, tops-only and strategy-proof rules on the semi-single-peaked domain can be established according to Theorem 1 of Bonifacio and Massó (2020). 27 Although Statement (ii) of the Theorem is an impossibility statement for designing, its proof shows that an (a, b)-semi-hybrid domain D on a tree T A admits the following tops-only and strategy-proof rule, called the hybrid rule: given a voter i ∈ N , for all P ∈ D n ,…”
Section: A Classification Of Non-dictatorial Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seeming paradox is of course not a paradox: the non-tops-only rules for a semi-single-peaked domain continue to be strategy-proof for the single-peaked domain, except that they become topsonly when restricted to the single-peaked domain and are thus subsumed in the usual known class of strategy-proof rules for single-peaked domains. For instance, in the case of two voters, on the singlepeaked domain, the characterization theorem ofMoulin (1980) implies that the number of tops-only and strategy-proof rules that in addition satisfies anonymity equals the number of alternatives, while on the semi-single-peaked domain, this number reduces to be one according to Corollary 1 ofBonifacio and Massó (2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of strategy-proof deterministic social choice functions on single-peaked domains was initiated by Moulin (1980) and developed further by Barberà et al (1993), Ching (1997) and Weymark (2011). In the deterministic setting, Nehring and Puppe (2007), Chatterji et al (2013), Reffgen (2015), Chatterji and Massó (2018), Achuthankutty and Roy (2020) and Bonifacio and Massó (2020) analyze the structure of unanimous and strategy-proof social choice functions on domains closely related to single-peakedness.…”
Section: Relationship With the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%