2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10955-017-1945-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Statistical Modeling of Sequencing Noise in High Depth Data to Assess Tumor Evolution

Abstract: One cause of cancer mortality is tumor evolution to therapy-resistant disease. First line therapy often targets the dominant clone, and drug resistance can emerge from preexisting clones that gain fitness through therapy-induced natural selection. Such mutations may be identified using targeted sequencing assays by analysis of noise in high-depth data. Here, we develop a comprehensive, unbiased model for sequencing error background. We find that noise in sufficiently deep DNA sequencing data can be approximate… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To validate that JAK2 mutations existed in hematopoietic elements, we performed manual macrodissection on paraffin-embedded specimens to enrich for cancer or hematopoietic cells and sequenced these samples at high depth (>2500×) using a 49-gene panel (RainDance Technologies) on Illumina MiSeq. We identified all sites that were different from the reference using an inclusive variant caller and used a Bayesian approach to detect true mutations against background error in which mutations were tested in each sample against 33 previously sequenced, JAK2 wild-type samples. After correcting for multiple hypotheses using the Benjamini-Hochberg method, we generated a list of variants with a false-discovery rate less than 0.001.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate that JAK2 mutations existed in hematopoietic elements, we performed manual macrodissection on paraffin-embedded specimens to enrich for cancer or hematopoietic cells and sequenced these samples at high depth (>2500×) using a 49-gene panel (RainDance Technologies) on Illumina MiSeq. We identified all sites that were different from the reference using an inclusive variant caller and used a Bayesian approach to detect true mutations against background error in which mutations were tested in each sample against 33 previously sequenced, JAK2 wild-type samples. After correcting for multiple hypotheses using the Benjamini-Hochberg method, we generated a list of variants with a false-discovery rate less than 0.001.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To detect true mutations against background error, we used a Bayesian approach as described previously. 28 Because of variation in sequencing depth and mutation-specific sensitivity across the gene and between samples, we applied an uniform 2% variant allele frequency threshold for mutation calling. Details are given in the supplemental Methods.…”
Section: Nt5c2 Sequence Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that previous work has shown that DNA sequencing count data is well-represented by a negative binomial distribution (Rabadan et al, 2018).…”
Section: Augment-and-marginalize Gibbs Sampling For Gamma–poisson Modelmentioning
confidence: 77%