1960
DOI: 10.1112/jlms/s1-35.2.229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Starlike and Convex Schlicht Functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following simple proof is due to J. Clunie and F. R. Keogh [1]. For g(z) = z + f bkzk G Nx(e) k = 2…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following simple proof is due to J. Clunie and F. R. Keogh [1]. For g(z) = z + f bkzk G Nx(e) k = 2…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we would like to point out that Lemma A gives generalizations of the some cases in Gromova and Vasil'ev [5], e.g. λ 2 = 0 in [5,Theorems 1,3,4]. We refer to Corollary 3.…”
Section: Preliminaries and The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is shown in [2] that if the area off(A) is finite, then also (na(n))elx. If, in addition, ¡i is absolutely continuous (relative to normalised Lebesgue measure m), then, as Pommerenke has shown in [5], lim na(n)=0.…”
Section: F(z) Jl -Zymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Returning to (23) and noting that now ^=1, we infer that p, is concentrated on the set {£, lw, • ■ ■ , &"}, where con+x=l, cojíl. Since c(k)=0 ifl^k<n, p. has mass l/(«+l) at each point of this set, and a straightforward analysis of (2) shows that g reduces to (17). The proof is complete.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 2 Starting Withmentioning
confidence: 99%