2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2006.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On spurious oscillations at layers diminishing (SOLD) methods for convection–diffusion equations: Part I – A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
199
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
5
199
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This stabilization parameter is compared with the well known expression h k /(2|α| k ) (coth((P e) k ) − 1/(P e) k ). In order to compute the previous expression, two different choices for the element size are used: the smallest edge side of the triangle, h 1 k , and the diameter of the element Ω k in the direction of the advection field α, h 2 k , see [24]. These two different expressions to compute the element size yield two different choices of the stabilization parameter, denoted by τ 2 k and τ 3 k respectively.…”
Section: Example 3: Inner Shockfront and Boundary Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This stabilization parameter is compared with the well known expression h k /(2|α| k ) (coth((P e) k ) − 1/(P e) k ). In order to compute the previous expression, two different choices for the element size are used: the smallest edge side of the triangle, h 1 k , and the diameter of the element Ω k in the direction of the advection field α, h 2 k , see [24]. These two different expressions to compute the element size yield two different choices of the stabilization parameter, denoted by τ 2 k and τ 3 k respectively.…”
Section: Example 3: Inner Shockfront and Boundary Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the stabilization parameter is chosen following [22]. However, the error estimation procedure is valid for any choice of the definition of the stabilization parameter, see for instance [23,24,25,26].…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by the bad experiences with the SUPG method and the upwind method, comprehensive numerical studies of stabilized finite element methods for scalar time-dependent convection-diffusion-reaction equations were performed in [17,18]. These studies included besides the SUPG method a number of Spurious Oscillations at Layers Diminishing (SOLD) schemes [11,12], a local projection stabilization (LPS) scheme [25] and two FiniteElement-Method Flux-Corrected-Transport (FEM-FCT) schemes [21,22,23]. All studies in [17,18] led to the consistent conclusion that the FEM-FCT schemes are far better than the other approaches.…”
Section: The Equations For the Chemical Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the solution of (11) can be expected to be much more expensive than the solution of the rest of the equations. The main goal of this paper consists in studying different approaches for discretizing (11) and exploring the impact of using expensive, higher order discretizations and inexpensive, low order methods on the accuracy and the computing times. The first approach which will be studied is the linear FEM-FCT scheme described above.…”
Section: The Equations For the Chemical Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation