1995
DOI: 10.1086/175783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Spectral Line Formation and Measurement in Cepheids: Implications to Distance Determination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
98
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At short period, shocks generated by pulsation are stronger and more frequent than at longer period, furthermore, X-ray and UV observations of short-period Cepheids suggest the presence of very hot >10 5 K plasma in the envelope that may be related to chromospheres (Engle et al 2009). This simple test suggests that chromospheric effects may affect the Pp relation, for instance, Sabbey et al (1995) did find a value p = 1.6 from hydrodynamic models suggesting the possibility of limb-brightening in spectral lines as a function of pulsation phase. A third possible resolution is related to uncertainties of Cepheid parameters, in particular gravity.…”
Section: Why Do Theory and Observations Disagree?mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At short period, shocks generated by pulsation are stronger and more frequent than at longer period, furthermore, X-ray and UV observations of short-period Cepheids suggest the presence of very hot >10 5 K plasma in the envelope that may be related to chromospheres (Engle et al 2009). This simple test suggests that chromospheric effects may affect the Pp relation, for instance, Sabbey et al (1995) did find a value p = 1.6 from hydrodynamic models suggesting the possibility of limb-brightening in spectral lines as a function of pulsation phase. A third possible resolution is related to uncertainties of Cepheid parameters, in particular gravity.…”
Section: Why Do Theory and Observations Disagree?mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Hindsley & Bell (1986) used a similar method to measure how the p-factor varies as a function of pulsation period p = −0.03 log P + 1.39. Similarly, Sabbey et al (1995) using hydrodynamic models to measure the p-factor as a function of pulsation phase, found p = 1.3 to p = 1.6. Recent theoretical measurements based on spectral line profiles from hydrodynamical spherically-symmetric model stellar atmospheres, with HARPS spectroscopic measurements, Nardetto et al (2004Nardetto et al ( , 2007 yielded both a geometric (their Eq.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The exact phase dependence of the p-factor is beyond the scope of this paper. However, for Aql and Gem, the net effect of a variable p-factor can be approximated by using a 6% larger constant p-factor (Sabbey et al 1995). Thus, for both Cepheids we use an effective p-factor of 1:43 AE 0:06, constant for all pulsational phases.…”
Section: Distances and Radiimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the limited number of observations available (e.g., only three H-band measurements of Aql), we used the shape of the radial velocity curve derived from the fit to the optical data (i.e., by using the same Fourier coefficients); the IR data were only used to determine an overall amplitude of the velocity curve. For the IR points we used an effective p-factor of 1:41 AE 0:03, as recommended by D. Sasselov (2001, private communication) and based on an analysis by Sabbey et al (1995), taking into account both the use of a constant p-factor and the use of parabolic line fitting. The resulting best-fit parameters are very similar to those based on optical radial velocities (i.e., Table 5 (top) and Gem (bottom) as a function of pulsational phase, together with a model based on radial velocity data, but fitting for distance, mean radius, and phase shift.…”
Section: Distances and Radiimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10,11,12,13,14] and references therein for a discussion of those non-trivial questions on the projection factor and other problems related to BW method in Cepheids. In reality, one can measure directly only the matter velocity vm on the photospheric level.…”
Section: Classical Baade-wesselink and Kirshner-kwan Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%