2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11856-018-1693-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On spectral gaps of Markov maps

Abstract: It is shown that if a Markov map T on a noncommutative probability space M has a spectral gap on L 2 (M), then it also has one on Lp(M) for 1 < p < ∞. For fixed p, the converse also holds if T is factorizable. Some results are also new for classical probability spaces.2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 46L51; 47A30.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observe that here the restriction on the dimension arises for the case of the full spherical maximal operator due to the estimate (9), where the L 2 boundedness of M full is required (following from Theorem 5.3). Indeed, M full is not bounded for p ≤ 2 in dimension n = 2.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Observe that here the restriction on the dimension arises for the case of the full spherical maximal operator due to the estimate (9), where the L 2 boundedness of M full is required (following from Theorem 5.3). Indeed, M full is not bounded for p ≤ 2 in dimension n = 2.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, M lac (f 1 , f 2 ), h can be dominated by the sum of finitely many sparse forms. Finally, one can find a universal sparse form (see [9,Proposition 2.1]) in the sparse domination. We proceed to prove the sparse domination result for the operator M D∩Q 0 .…”
Section: Sparse Domination: Proof Of Theorem 22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is clearly equivalent to δ P (T ) < 1. When X is taken as a non-commutative L p -spaces, the spectral gap of Markov operator has been recently studied in [5]. In the classical setting, this gap has been extensively investigated by many authors (see for example, [17]).…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is clearly equivalent to δ P (T ) < 1. When X is taken as a noncommutative L p -spaces, the spectral gap of Markov operator has been recently studied in [8]. In the classical setting, this gap has been extensively investigated by many authors (see for example, [25]).…”
Section: Thenmentioning
confidence: 99%