2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On some methods for performance ranking and correspondence analysis in the DEA context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other units that are located in a convex space (production capability set) are inefficient units (Banker et al , 1984). Inefficient units are rated by using basic DEA models with efficiency scores (between zero and one), however, units with efficiency scores of one are not rated (Tsou and Huang, 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other units that are located in a convex space (production capability set) are inefficient units (Banker et al , 1984). Inefficient units are rated by using basic DEA models with efficiency scores (between zero and one), however, units with efficiency scores of one are not rated (Tsou and Huang, 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"DEA as a non-parametric approach is able to provide relative efficiency for a series of DMUs based on multiple inputs/outputs with no assumptions of production function" (Tsou & Huang, 2010). The DEA methodology calculates a measure of the relative efficiency of each DMU.…”
Section: Data Envelopment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an input matrix A∈R m×n , with rank r, r ≤ min(m, n), the SVD of A can be written in the form of [21]:…”
Section: Single Variable Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%