Singularities and Computer Algebra 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-28829-1_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Some Conjectures About Free and Nearly Free Divisors

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper infinite families of examples of irreducible free and nearly free curves in the complex projective plane which are not rational curves and whose local singularites can have an arbitrary number of branches are given. All these examples answer negatively to some conjectures proposed by A. Dimca and G. Sticlaru. Our examples say nothing about the most remarkable conjecture by A. Dimca and G. Sticlaru, i.e. every rational cuspidal plane curve is either free or nearly free.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof. When C is a plus-one generated curve, then the formulas for the exponents and for the total Tjurina number follow from Proposition 3.7 and Proposition 2.1 (4). We assume now that C is not a plus-one generated curve, which in view of Theorem 2.3 means exactly that d 1 + d 2 > d. We prove that this inequality implies that the Hilbert function of the Jacobian module N(f ) has not the form described in Corollary 3.10 and that ν(C) ≥ 3, unless C is as in (ii) above.…”
Section: Remark 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Proof. When C is a plus-one generated curve, then the formulas for the exponents and for the total Tjurina number follow from Proposition 3.7 and Proposition 2.1 (4). We assume now that C is not a plus-one generated curve, which in view of Theorem 2.3 means exactly that d 1 + d 2 > d. We prove that this inequality implies that the Hilbert function of the Jacobian module N(f ) has not the form described in Corollary 3.10 and that ν(C) ≥ 3, unless C is as in (ii) above.…”
Section: Remark 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, for a reduced degree d curve C, one has m ≤ d + 1, see [18,Proposition 2.1], while for the case C a line arrangement, we have the slightly stronger inequality m ≤ d − 1, see [16,Corollary 1.3], as well as its generalization in Corollary 5.2 below. The curve C is free when m = 2, since then AR(f ) is a free module of rank 2, see for such curves [4,9,13,28,29,30]. In this note we consider the next simplest possibility for this resolution, namely we start the study of the 3-syzygy curves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also show that there exist rational free curves and nearly free curves that are not cuspidal. Examples showing that there exist free curves and nearly free curves that are not rational curves are given in [ABGLMH17].…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recall that C is a free curve if Jf=If, or equivalently ν(C)=0, see . Note that for a free curve C:f=0 of degree d , one has the exponents (d1,d2) where d1=mdrfalse(ffalse) and d2=d1d1, as well as the formula τfalse(Cfalse)=(d1)2d1d2.Similarly, C is a nearly free curve if ν(C)=1, see . Note that one has σ(C)=d+mdr(f)3 for a nearly free curve by [, Corollary 2.17].…”
Section: Various Prerequisitesmentioning
confidence: 99%