2008
DOI: 10.1007/s12289-008-0155-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On some computational aspects for incremental sheet metal forming simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers claimed that FEM simulation of SPIF process took a huge computational time because of large model and non-linear conditions in the system. With ABAQUS/Explicit solver, there are two approaches that can be applied to decrease the computational time such as mass scaling and time scaling [9][10]. Depending on applications, a proper approach should be considered to have an accurate result.…”
Section: Simulation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Researchers claimed that FEM simulation of SPIF process took a huge computational time because of large model and non-linear conditions in the system. With ABAQUS/Explicit solver, there are two approaches that can be applied to decrease the computational time such as mass scaling and time scaling [9][10]. Depending on applications, a proper approach should be considered to have an accurate result.…”
Section: Simulation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large material deformation in this process led to a severe element distortion and entanglement. These can lead to decrease in the size of the stable time increment and accuracy of simulated results [10]. Therefore, the adaptive meshing tool should be used in the simulation of SPIF process to increase meshing quality.…”
Section: Adaptive Meshingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presented work extracts the CAD data from CATIA version5 R20 and exports them to CAM software which is MasterCAM 2010 to extract the G codes and M codes and transfer them to the CNC milling machine. Some works use technical software in the final results to predict the valid results to show the numerical error and the accuracy of the process [3,11]. On the other hand, numerical error also is designed for CNC milling machining which is different with forming with CNC machine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical simulation of this process is time consuming due to the necessity to take into account various non-linearity such as the material behaviour, large strain deformation and the evolution of the toolflange contact. A previous work has showed [4] that, in this process, using the theory of incremental deformation to reduce the time for material behaviour non-linearity (compared with the flow rule theory), give good results but the time benefit is small (approximately 5% for a cylindrical cup benchmark). This is because there are a small numbers of elements in plastic domain at a given time increment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%