Essays and Surveys in Global Optimization
DOI: 10.1007/0-387-25570-2_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Solving Polynomial, Factorable, and Black-Box Optimization Problems Using the RLT Methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several alternative schemes of implementing this concept by replacing the vector x (1) in (9) by higher-order polynomial terms have been proposed by Sherali and Desai (2005), and ongoing investigations exhibit a promise of enhancing the solvability of many challenging problems using this idea.…”
Section: Enhancing Rlt Via Semidefinite Cutsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several alternative schemes of implementing this concept by replacing the vector x (1) in (9) by higher-order polynomial terms have been proposed by Sherali and Desai (2005), and ongoing investigations exhibit a promise of enhancing the solvability of many challenging problems using this idea.…”
Section: Enhancing Rlt Via Semidefinite Cutsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Banerjee and Ierapetritou (2002) use high-dimensional model representations to approximate the black box, Kofler (2007) uses nonlinear covariance models, Pelikan et al (2001) apply Bayesian network models, Driessen et al (2006) optimize a linear model in a trust region. Response surface methodology-based on paradigms such as neural networks, kriging and radial basis functions-has been a popular choice for the optimization of expensive black boxes in chemical engineering (Davis and Ierapetritou, 2007), global optimization (Jones et al, 1998;Regis and Shoemaker, 2005;Sherali and Desai, 2005;Huang et al, 2006;Holmström et al, 2007;Holmström, 2008) and simulation-optimization (Daughety and Turnquist, 1981;Humphrey and Wilson, 2000;Keys and Rees, 2004;Rosen and Harmonosky, 2005;Wang, 2005;Alkhamis and Ahmed, 2006;Barton and Meckesheimer, 2006;Kleijnen, 2008;Angün et al, 2009;Yalçinkaya and Bayhan, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%