1996
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(95)01452-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On SO(32) heterotic — type I superstring duality in ten dimensions

Abstract: We provide some additional evidence in favour of the strong -weak coupling duality between the SO(32) heterotic and type I superstring theories by comparing terms quartic in the gauge field strength in their low-energy effective actions. We argue that these terms should not receive higher-loop string corrections so that duality should relate the leadingorder perturbative coefficients in the two theories. In particular, we demonstrate that the coefficient of the F 4 -term in the one-loop (torus) part of the SO(… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus the absence of the trF 2 trF 2 term in the torus correction in SO(32) heterotic string is crucial for the consistency of the duality: in type I theory such double-trace term could not originate from the disc diagram which has only one boundary. As was pointed out in [18], the coefficient of the disc t 8 trF 4 term in type I theory [10,11] is indeed the same as the 1-loop coefficient of this term (see (3.8),(3.7)) the heterotic string [21,22].…”
Section: Comparison With Type I Theorysupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus the absence of the trF 2 trF 2 term in the torus correction in SO(32) heterotic string is crucial for the consistency of the duality: in type I theory such double-trace term could not originate from the disc diagram which has only one boundary. As was pointed out in [18], the coefficient of the disc t 8 trF 4 term in type I theory [10,11] is indeed the same as the 1-loop coefficient of this term (see (3.8),(3.7)) the heterotic string [21,22].…”
Section: Comparison With Type I Theorysupporting
confidence: 55%
“…2 There are, indeed, examples of terms in the string effective actions which are either not renormalised by string higher-loop corrections (like second-derivative terms and 'anomalycancelling' terms, see, e.g., [12,13,14,15]) or receive contributions only from specific orders of string perturbative expansion (see [16,17]). In [18] we considered a term quartic in the gauge field strength trF 4 which, in heterotic string theory, is absent at the tree level [19,20] but appears at the one-loop level [21,22,23]. We have argued that it does not receive corrections from higher loops since D = 10 supersymmetry relates [24,25] it to the 'anomaly-cancelling' term BtrF 4 [26] which is not renormalised at higher orders [27,15] (see also below).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A second is from the duality [36] between the Heterotic E 8 × E 8 theory and M-theory [37], [38]. A third is from the interplay between space-time supersymmetry and space-time anomalies [33]. A discussion of such non-renormalization effects order by order in the string coupling was given in [34,35].…”
Section: Effective Action Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the Heterotic Spin(32)/Z 2 -Type I duality [30,31,32] has been used to argue that nonvanishing two-loop corrections to R 4 should arise on the Heterotic side [33].…”
Section: Effective Action R 4 Terms In the Heterotic Stringmentioning
confidence: 99%