2020
DOI: 10.1093/imrn/rnz370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Smooth Projective D-Affine Varieties

Abstract: We show various properties of smooth projective D-affine varieties. In particular, any smooth projective D-affine variety is algebraically simply connected and its image under a fibration is D-affine. In characteristic 0 such D-affine varieties are also uniruled. We also show that (apart from a few small characteristics) a smooth projective surface is D-affine if and only if it is isomorphic to either ${{\mathbb{P}}}^2$ or ${{\mathbb{P}}}^1\times{{\mathbb{P}}}^1$. In positive characteristic, a basic tool in th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are now ready to introduce the main example of this note by taking p -cyclic covering of abelian surfaces. A similar construction has been used in [ 24 , Sect. 5.1] to construct counterexamples to Miyaoka’s semipositivity theorems in positive characteristic.…”
Section: Proof Of the Main Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We are now ready to introduce the main example of this note by taking p -cyclic covering of abelian surfaces. A similar construction has been used in [ 24 , Sect. 5.1] to construct counterexamples to Miyaoka’s semipositivity theorems in positive characteristic.…”
Section: Proof Of the Main Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This construction, introduced by Ekedahl [ 13 , page 145] and revisited by Kollár in [ 22 ], gives a counterexample to the Bogomolov–Sommese vanishing theorem in positive characteristic. It has recently been revisited by Langer to give counterexamples to Miyaoka’s generic semipositivity [ 24 , Sect. 5.1] and by Graf to construct counterexamples to the logarithmic extension theorem for differential forms ( [ 14 , Theorem 1.6]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are further notions of D-affinity and derived D-affinity in positive characteristic when instead of Grothendieck differential operators, either small differential operators [8,11,12,19] or crystalline differential operators [3,4,16] are studied. These are not covered by the present paper, although some of our methods may prove useful for these unusual differential operators.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%