2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.11.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-site spectrophotometric determination of antimony in water, soil and dust samples of Central India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main source of these metals for human is food [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. The results obtained in the presented work for trace elements in chicken and chicken products were acceptable to human consumption at nutritional and toxic levels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The main source of these metals for human is food [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. The results obtained in the presented work for trace elements in chicken and chicken products were acceptable to human consumption at nutritional and toxic levels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The metal contains were estimated using N-phenylbeziumidylthiourea and Phenanthroline methods for Sb (Shrivas et al, 2008) and Fe (De, 2008) respectively. The pH values of the water samples were examined at the site of sample collection with a portable pH meter (Eutech, pH Tester 30).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antimony(V) was also determined after reduction to antimony(III) with sodium sulfite. The main figures of merits (Table 1) of the proposed method were compared successfully with many of the published electrochemical, chromatographic and spectrometric methods [9,15,29,36,[40][41][42][43][44]. The values of LOD and LOQ are lower than those were obtained by some electrochemical methods [9,36,39,42].…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, the reported method [29] suffered from time consuming, selectivity and reproducibility. Moreover, the developed method is more selective and sensitive than most of the reported methods [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44].The validation of the DP CSV method for the assay of various concentrations of antimony(III) and (V) species in de ionized water was investigated. The results are summarized in Table 2, where, a satisfactory recovery percentage of antimony species was achieved confirming the precision of the method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%