2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.02.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-site nutrient recovery and removal from source-separated urine by phosphorus precipitation and short-cut nitrification-denitrification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Integrative waste water treatment alternatives, considering P-recovery by chemical precipitation before biological N oxidation or removal, have conceptually been analysed under different scenarios [103,104] and also experimentally studied [66][67][68][69][105][106][107][108][109][110][111][112][113][114][115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122], as summarised in Table 2 (an extended version of this table is provided as Supplementary Material). Chemically induced phosphate precipitation before BNR from waste water-and also in the case of not considering BNR-typically requires to increase the pH (preferably above 8.0-8.5) by dosing an alkaline reagent (e.g., sodium hydroxide, NaOH) or by applying CO 2 stripping [93,123], and to adjust the amount of alkaline-earth metal ions (i.e., Mg 2+ or Ca 2+ ) available to effective concentrations according to the accessible phosphate-typically slightly above the theoretically needed ratios.…”
Section: Phosphorus Recovery Before Biological N Treatment (Upstream Configuration)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Integrative waste water treatment alternatives, considering P-recovery by chemical precipitation before biological N oxidation or removal, have conceptually been analysed under different scenarios [103,104] and also experimentally studied [66][67][68][69][105][106][107][108][109][110][111][112][113][114][115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122], as summarised in Table 2 (an extended version of this table is provided as Supplementary Material). Chemically induced phosphate precipitation before BNR from waste water-and also in the case of not considering BNR-typically requires to increase the pH (preferably above 8.0-8.5) by dosing an alkaline reagent (e.g., sodium hydroxide, NaOH) or by applying CO 2 stripping [93,123], and to adjust the amount of alkaline-earth metal ions (i.e., Mg 2+ or Ca 2+ ) available to effective concentrations according to the accessible phosphate-typically slightly above the theoretically needed ratios.…”
Section: Phosphorus Recovery Before Biological N Treatment (Upstream Configuration)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemicals commonly used as precipitant agents are oxides (MgO, CaO), hydroxides (Mg(OH) 2 , Ca(OH) 2 ), and soluble salts (e.g., MgCl 2 , CaCl 2 ) [68,107,122]. Alternatively, low grade renewable sources, including secondary raw materials and by-products [108], or seawater [110], can also be used. Feasibility of their use depends on factors, such as metal compound availability, solubility, and reactivity [39].…”
Section: Phosphorus Recovery Before Biological N Treatment (Upstream Configuration)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, major conclusions from previous research include >95% TP recovery using MgCl 2 and >90% TAN recovery by increasing the pH and temperature of the solution. The gap in knowledge lies in the few studies that combine N and P treatment in series to produce separate N and P products, 30,31,[51][52][53][54] and minimal research on treatment processes to recover N, P, and K at significant concentrations. 30,55,56 For example, major conclusions on treatment processes to recover N, P, and K include a lack of significant N and K recovery via precipitation without the equimolar addition of P and Mg 2+ to N or K + in solution.…”
Section: Synthetic Urine With Metabolites Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shortcut biological nitrogen removal is achieved through controlling environmental conditions and preventing further oxidation of nitrite nitrogen. This process can save 40% of carbon and 25% of oxygen compared with the whole biological nitrogen removal process [4][5][6]. However, for polluted rivers, shortcut biological nitrogen removal has not been much studied in recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%