2020
DOI: 10.3390/s20102928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-Site Earthquake Early Warning Using Smartphones

Abstract: In this study, the measured accelerations of a single smartphone were used to provide an earthquake early warning system. In the presented system, after the smartphone is triggered, the triggering event is then classified as an earthquake event or not. Once an earthquake event is detected, the peak ground acceleration is then predicted every second until 10 s after the trigger. These predictions are made by the neural network classifier and predictor embedded in the smartphone, and an alert can be issued if a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is minimal information in the literature on any systems that use smartphones as their ground motion sensors for on-site approaches except the one implemented by Hsu and Nieh (2020). Thus, we have mainly discussed implementations that use MEMS-based sensors.…”
Section: On-site-based Earthquake Early Warning Systems Implemented G...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is minimal information in the literature on any systems that use smartphones as their ground motion sensors for on-site approaches except the one implemented by Hsu and Nieh (2020). Thus, we have mainly discussed implementations that use MEMS-based sensors.…”
Section: On-site-based Earthquake Early Warning Systems Implemented G...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2012) BLESeisWon et al (2020) TaiwanHsu and Nieh (2020) China Hu et al (2021) Italy Picozzi et al (2015) and D'Alessandro et al (2020) Northern India Mittal et al (2019) Public alert generation Taiwan Chen et al (2015) China Peng et al (2021a) Quake Catcher Network* Cochran et al (2009) MyShake* Kong et al (2016a) and Kong et al (2020b) Community Seismic Network* Clayton et al (2015) and Faulkner et al (2011) Earthquake Network* Finazzi (2020) and Bossu et al (2021) Google* Allen and Stogaitis (2022) South Korea Lee et al (2019a) and Wu et al (2021) Taiwan Wu et al (2013a) China Peng et al(2013) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an alternative to using a Pd relationship and, therefore, leads to practical applications for early warning (Festa et al, 2008). Applications of IV2p include recordings by deployments of standard seismological instruments (e.g., Brondi et al, 2015;Spallarossa et al, 2019), as well as smartphones (Hsu and Nieh, 2020). This onsite approach has the advantage of eliminating network design factors (such as requiring multiple suitable locations for instrument installation), while being more immediate; essentially, earthquake location is no longer required.…”
Section: Specificallymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Thessaly (Central Greece), urban areas are located near major active faults increasing the threat of strong seismic events, with, possibly, devastating ramifications for financial and industrial activities, as well as the safety of local population. Advances in signal processing, telecommunications and seismology have gradually rendered the concept of a reliable Earthquake Early Warning System (EEWS) not only feasible, but quite reliable as well (Nakamura, 1988;Kanamori et al, 1997;Allen and Kanamori, 2003;Kanamori, 2005;Simons et al, 2006;Allen, 2007;Gasparini et al, 2011;Vallianatos, 2013, 2015;Parolai et al, 2015;Hsu and Nieh, 2020;Brooks et al, Volume 58 2021). Damages from an impending strong motion can be reduced by taking mitigation measures suitable for the given warning time (Espinosa-Aranda et al, 1995;Wu et al, 1998;Iannacone et al, 2010;Beltramone and Gomes, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CPC used this information to detect earthquake, and calculated earthquake magnitude, epicenter and origin time. Hsu and Nieh (2020) also proposed a smartphone-based EEW system. This system is an on-site one that only used one smartphone for earthquake detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%