1976
DOI: 10.1038/260691b0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On simultaneous tilt and creep observations on the San Andreas Fault

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The short-period tilt data suggest that (1) a change in tilt amplitude of 10-8-10 -6 rad associated with creep events will be observed only if the tilt meter is less than 0.5-1.0 km from the fault trace, (2) the vertical extent of the slip zone associated with surface creep events may be less than a couple of kilometers but greater than about 0.5 km, (3) creep events on this part of the San Andreas fault do not appear to propagate uniformly over more than a couple of kilometers, and (4) the model presented in this paper suggests that about 0.5-1.0 mm of dipslip displacement is required to produce the residual deflection in the tilt wave forms observed at MEL during a creep event [Johnston et al, 1976].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The short-period tilt data suggest that (1) a change in tilt amplitude of 10-8-10 -6 rad associated with creep events will be observed only if the tilt meter is less than 0.5-1.0 km from the fault trace, (2) the vertical extent of the slip zone associated with surface creep events may be less than a couple of kilometers but greater than about 0.5 km, (3) creep events on this part of the San Andreas fault do not appear to propagate uniformly over more than a couple of kilometers, and (4) the model presented in this paper suggests that about 0.5-1.0 mm of dipslip displacement is required to produce the residual deflection in the tilt wave forms observed at MEL during a creep event [Johnston et al, 1976].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…2000). Tectonically induced creep events in tilt data have repeatedly been observed near major faults in California (Johnston et al . 1976; McHugh & Johnston 1976; Mortensen et al .…”
Section: Various Types Of Tilt Signalsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Near-field investigations of propagating fault creep have indicated that events of less than 3-ram amplitude are generally shallower than 2 km [Stewart et al, 1973;Johnston et al, 1976;McHugh and Johnston, 1978 Aside from its proximity to the permanent MWDM network [Slater and Huggett, 1976], the location provides the following advantages: (1) the near equivalence of the topography to half-space conditions for the comparatively localized and high spatial wavenumber strain fields associated with propagating creep, (2) the thick sedimentary infill within the propagating episodic fault creep activity, much of which occurs in large, regular events of about 5-mm amplitude.…”
Section: On a Larger Scale Periods Of Localized Activity Consisting mentioning
confidence: 99%