2010
DOI: 10.1112/s0025579310001130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ON SHRINKING TARGETS FOR ℤ m ACTIONS ON TORI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The set y ∈ π −1 (x) : µ(y) > 0 (where x ∈ X 2 is arbitrary) has also been investigated, and it is known to have full Hausdorff dimension as well as being a winning set for Schmidt's game. See for example [13], [5], [22], and [11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The set y ∈ π −1 (x) : µ(y) > 0 (where x ∈ X 2 is arbitrary) has also been investigated, and it is known to have full Hausdorff dimension as well as being a winning set for Schmidt's game. See for example [13], [5], [22], and [11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Простое доказательство это-го результата дали Я. Бюжо, С. Харрап, С. Кристенсен и С. Велани в [50]. Более того, они получили более сильную теорему, которую мы сейчас и сфор-мулируем.…”
Section: лемма 2 для последовательности векторовunclassified
“…Recently, Einsiedler & Tseng [8] extended the results of [4] and [22] to show amongst other related results that the set Bad L (n, m) is winning for any matrix L ∈ Mat n×m (R) (see also [12] and [16]). However, it appears their method cannot be extended to the weighted setting of the sets Bad L (k, n, m).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The set Bad {ur} was first shown in [4] to have full Hausdorff dimension for any sequence {u r } ∞ r=0 of non-zero integral vectors whose Euclidean norms form a lacunary sequence. We remark that in the case where the matrix M is not assumed to be chosen from Bad * (k, m, n) one may partition the sequence {u r } ∞ r=0 into a finite collection of subsequences {u t 0 +tr } ∞ r=0 such that each subsequence is lacunary with respect to the norm in (2.3); that is, the norm given by…”
Section: Corollary 24 Follows From Lemma 24 By the Observation Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation