“…Now, by Lemma 1 the series (9) converges which implies (12). Further, /(2') ^ 0 for at least some t since ||/||i,ip+i > 0, and so by Theorem 3 the estimates (11) p -must hold for all x, and this together with (9) iraplies f € L* (see [11], Lemma 1). Now, the arguments used at the end of the proof of Lemma 1 give /" e Li for every of > 0, whlch proves assertion (i).…”