2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2020.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On self-similar solutions to the incompressible Euler equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Uniqueness is known only for p = ∞ and was proved by Yudovich [43]. The uniqueness for unbounded vorticities is an old and outstanding open problem and only very recently some partial progress towards nonuniqueness has been achieved; see [7,8,34,40,41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uniqueness is known only for p = ∞ and was proved by Yudovich [43]. The uniqueness for unbounded vorticities is an old and outstanding open problem and only very recently some partial progress towards nonuniqueness has been achieved; see [7,8,34,40,41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that, for general initial data u0L2, weak solutions are not unique, see [14] and references therein. Moreover, uniqueness has not been established even under additional restrictions on integrability of vorticity, with the exception of ω0=curl u0L, see [15], and slightly weaker spaces close to L, see [16], and there is some indication of non-uniqueness of weak solutions if, for any 1p<normal∞, ω0Lp, see [17]. It is natural, therefore, to focus on special weak solutions, such as those obtained as limits of solutions of the more physically realistic Navier–Stokes equations.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These three components are then patched together by suitable matching conditions. A detailed analysis of the solution to (1.10) in a neighborhood of infinity and near the spirals' centers will appear in the companion paper [5], relying on the approach developed in [15,16,17]. In the present paper we focus on the derivation of a posteriori error estimates for a numerically computed solution to (1.10), on a bounded domain D ⊂ R 2 with smooth boundary ∂D.…”
Section: Remark 11mentioning
confidence: 99%