2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.10.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On selecting interestingness measures for association rules: User oriented description and multiple criteria decision aid

Abstract: Data mining algorithms, especially those used for unsupervised learning, generate a large quantity of rules. In particular this applies to the APRIORI family of algorithms for the determination of association rules. It is hence impossible for an expert in the field being mined to sustain these rules. To help carry out the task, many measures which evaluate the interestingness of rules have been developed. They make it possible to filter and sort automatically a set of rules with respect to given goals. Since t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
103
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, a user oriented description and multiple criteria decision aid can be incorporated into the recommendation process of one or more user-adapted interestingness measures for association rules (Lenca, Meyer, Vaillant, & Lallich, 2008). A standardization of the environment structure, of the formalisms and of the goals would certainly provide an easier implementation by simplifying preliminary work and would allow other industrial applications.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, a user oriented description and multiple criteria decision aid can be incorporated into the recommendation process of one or more user-adapted interestingness measures for association rules (Lenca, Meyer, Vaillant, & Lallich, 2008). A standardization of the environment structure, of the formalisms and of the goals would certainly provide an easier implementation by simplifying preliminary work and would allow other industrial applications.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using properties facilitates a general and practical way to automatically identify interesting measures. This trend has been enriched by different other works [2], [5], [11], [12] with an extensive number of properties. Nevertheless, these properties are not standards [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To bring even further characterization of measures and to choose a suitable one for a particular application and for particular user's expectations, many properties have been proposed and compared in the literature [9,12,16,26]. In the context of confirmation measures the following properties are often analysed: property M , Ex 1 and weak Ex 1 , L and weak L, and a group of symmetry properties.…”
Section: Confirmation Measures and Their Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%