1970
DOI: 10.2307/3612089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Scoring in Games

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to consider the question: if p is the probability that a player P will win a given rally against a player Q, what is the probability that P will win a given game? The answer, of course, depends upon the method of scoring; and the methods considered here will be those used in squash and, for comparison table tennis.In table tennis P earns a point each time that he wins a rally. But in squash he must serve the rally that he wins in order to gain a point; and he relinquishes the servi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The expected duration results were in agreement with those of Watson (1970) and Clarke and Norman (1979), each of whom used a two-dimensional approach. However, the advantage of the three-dimensional approach is that it allows for the expected number of handouts to be calculated and the importance of all the states to be evaluated.…”
Section: Pollardsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The expected duration results were in agreement with those of Watson (1970) and Clarke and Norman (1979), each of whom used a two-dimensional approach. However, the advantage of the three-dimensional approach is that it allows for the expected number of handouts to be calculated and the importance of all the states to be evaluated.…”
Section: Pollardsupporting
confidence: 77%