2017
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6544/aa6166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On robustness of a strong solution to the Navier–Stokes equations with Navier’s boundary conditions in theL3-norm

Abstract: We recall or prove a series of results on solutions to the Navier-Stokes equation with Navier's slip boundary conditions. The main theorem says that a strong solution u on any time interval (0,T ) (where < ∞ T 0 ⩽ ) is robust in the sense that small perturbations of the initial value in the norm of Ω σ L 3 ( ) and the acting body force in the norm of Ω L T L 0, ; 2 32 ( ( )) / cause only a small perturbation of solution u in the norm of Ω L 3 ( ). This result particularly implies that the maximum length of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since u(0) ∈ L 3 σ (Ω), χ > 0 (see lemma 12). We will prove that χ = T. Proceeding by contradiction we suppose that χ < T. (22) Due to (13) there exists an arbitrarily small T 1 ∈ (0, χ) such that…”
Section: The Case Of Navier Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Since u(0) ∈ L 3 σ (Ω), χ > 0 (see lemma 12). We will prove that χ = T. Proceeding by contradiction we suppose that χ < T. (22) Due to (13) there exists an arbitrarily small T 1 ∈ (0, χ) such that…”
Section: The Case Of Navier Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The following result is proved in Amrouche et al 23, Theorem 1.1 or in Kučera and Neustupa. 28,Lemma 3 Lemma 11. Let u 0 ∈ L 3 𝜎 (Ω).…”
Section: Lemma 10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is why a series of important results, well known from the theory of equations (1), (2) with the noslip boundary condition, have not been explicitly proven in literature for equations with boundary conditions (3), (4), although many of them can be obtained in a similar or almost the same way. This concerns except others the local in time existence of a strong solution (here, however, one can cite the papers [20,22], where the local in time existence of a strong solution is proven in the case when K = I, ≥ 0), the uniqueness of the weak solution, and the socalled theorem on structure. This theorem states that if the specific volume force f is at least in 2 (0, ; L 2 (Ω)) and k is a weak solution of the Navier-Stokes problem with the no-slip boundary condition, satisfying the strong energy inequality, then (0, ) = ⋃ ∈Γ ( , ) ∪ , where set Γ is at most countable, the intervals ( , ) are pairwise disjoint, the 1D Lebesgue measure of set is zero, and solution k coincides with a strong solution in the interior of each of the time intervals ( , ).…”
Section: A Weak Solution Of Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%