2009
DOI: 10.1002/rnc.1426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On robust control algorithms for nonlinear network consensus protocols

Abstract: Even though many consensus protocol algorithms have been developed over the last several years in the literature, robustness properties of these algorithms involving nonlinear dynamics have been largely ignored. Robustness here refers to sensitivity of the control algorithm achieving semistability and consensus in the face of model uncertainty. In this paper, we examine the robustness of several control algorithms for network consensus protocols with information model uncertainty of a specified structure. In p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Communication over networks is often unreliable and noisy. This inspired research on the robustness of consensus algorithms [43,44,22,14,16,40]. In [27], robustness was discussed for average consensus algorithms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Communication over networks is often unreliable and noisy. This inspired research on the robustness of consensus algorithms [43,44,22,14,16,40]. In [27], robustness was discussed for average consensus algorithms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, it is possible for a trajectory to converge to the set of equilibria without converging to any one equilibrium point as examples in [32] show. Conversely, semistability does not imply that the equilibrium set is asymptotically stable in any accepted sense [33]. This is because stability of sets is defined in terms of distance (especially in case of noncompact sets), and it is possible to construct examples in which the dynamical system is semistable, but the domain of semistability contains no ε-neighborhood (defined in terms of the distance) of the (noncompact) equilibrium set, thus ruling out asymptotic stability of the equilibrium set.…”
Section: Definition 41: I) the Linear Time-varying Iterationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially, the design of distributed control algorithms based on agent's local interaction information in multi-agent networks such as rendezvous control of multinonholonomic agents [8], formation control [2,15], and flocking attitude alignment [4,23], has drawn much attention from researchers due to its broad range of applications. The formation control, flocking, and rendezvous, can be unified in the general framework of consensus setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%