1968
DOI: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.1968.tb01757.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Rh Immunization and Its Prevention: Observations and Thoughts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here the failure rate is extremely low and this is probably related to the fact that many women are excluded from treatment who would probably be given anti-D antibody in other centres. This is because Canadian workers, using particularly sensitive enzyme techniques, find a much higher incidence of primary immunization during pregnancy (about 2% as against about 0.8% elsewhere; Chown, 1968). To combat this, Canada was early on the scene with ante-natal treatment (Zipursky, Pollack, Chown & Israels, 1965) and a large-scale trial has now been instituted in which anti-D antibody is given in the last trimester of pregnancy as well as after delivery.…”
Section: Some Details Of the Prophylaxis Of Rh Haemolytic Disease Of mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Here the failure rate is extremely low and this is probably related to the fact that many women are excluded from treatment who would probably be given anti-D antibody in other centres. This is because Canadian workers, using particularly sensitive enzyme techniques, find a much higher incidence of primary immunization during pregnancy (about 2% as against about 0.8% elsewhere; Chown, 1968). To combat this, Canada was early on the scene with ante-natal treatment (Zipursky, Pollack, Chown & Israels, 1965) and a large-scale trial has now been instituted in which anti-D antibody is given in the last trimester of pregnancy as well as after delivery.…”
Section: Some Details Of the Prophylaxis Of Rh Haemolytic Disease Of mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although it wasoncegenerally accepted that Rh-immunization during pregnancy was rare (Nevanlinna & Vaino, 1962), it had been reported that the frequency of this phenomenon was not negligible (Hartmann & Brendemoen, 1953). Later studies have shown that the frequency of Rh-immunization during pregnancy is of the order of 1-3 per cent (Bishop & Krieger, 1970;Bowman, 1971;Chown, 1968;Dambrosio, 1971; Dudok de Witt et al, 1968). A clinical investigation using 250 pg anti-D for prophylaxis of Rh-immunization was started in 1968 at the Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at Vaxjo in order to find answers to the following questions: ( a ) How many Rh-negative women delivered of Rh-positive babies have antibodies at parturition?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%