2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-99498-7_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Reversibility and Broadcast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further investigation on the relation between our work and [2], studying reversibility in Markov chains, is left for future work. The treatment of passage of time shares some similarities with broadcast [24]: time actions affect parallel components in the same way, and idempatience can be seen as unavailability of top-level receivers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further investigation on the relation between our work and [2], studying reversibility in Markov chains, is left for future work. The treatment of passage of time shares some similarities with broadcast [24]: time actions affect parallel components in the same way, and idempatience can be seen as unavailability of top-level receivers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, other definitions of reversibility for concurrent systems exist [37], but they do not have (nor want to have) this property. This property has been proved in a number of formalisms [14,36,28,19,35] (mostly in a more general form called the Parabolic Lemma or the Rearranging Lemma). Below, however, we show it to be a very general, language-independent result, depending only on the definition of causal-consistent reversibility and on the Loop Lemma.…”
Section: Which Notion Of Reversibility For Concurrent Systems?mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…By doing this, one obtains the uncontrolled causal-consistent semantics of the language, specifying how actions can be done and undone according to causal-consistent reversibility. This approach has been applied to many process calculi and programming languages, including CCS [14] and a family of similar calculi [36], CCS with broadcast synchronization [35], π-calculus [12], higher-order π [28], Klaim [19], µOz [33] and Core Erlang [31]. We remark however that the results above does not tell how to efficiently track and store history information, and how to efficiently exploit it for undoing actions.…”
Section: Which Notion Of Reversibility For Concurrent Systems?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first approach extended causal-consistent reversibility from CCS to any calculus defined using a specific SOS format (a subset of the path format [146]) [160,161], and to π-calculus [42]. In the second line of research we find extensions of a fragment of CCS with biological relevance [35,36], of the higher-order π-calculus [117,119], of the coordination language Klaim [56], of a π-calculus with sessions [179], and of a CCS with broadcast communications [133]. The instance of the framework in [160] on CCS is called CCSK.…”
Section: Reversing Process Calculimentioning
confidence: 99%