Interaction and Grammar 1996
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511620874.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On repeats and responses in Finnish conversations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
1
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
44
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, when participants in sequence-final environments twice pass up the chance to initiate a sequence, conversations enter a state of ''topic attrition' ' (1983a: 21). Similar observations about acknowledgment tokens and assessments have been made for Australian English (Gardner, 2001), Finnish (Sorjonen, 1996(Sorjonen, , 2001, Korean (Hayashi and Yoon, 2009), and Japanese (Hayashi and Yoon, 2009;Iwasaki, 1997;Tanaka, 2010). This article builds on these studies by describing how English-speaking participants use acknowledgment tokens, assessments, and other closure-implicative objects in managing the practical issues related to lapses in conversational interaction.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Specifically, when participants in sequence-final environments twice pass up the chance to initiate a sequence, conversations enter a state of ''topic attrition' ' (1983a: 21). Similar observations about acknowledgment tokens and assessments have been made for Australian English (Gardner, 2001), Finnish (Sorjonen, 1996(Sorjonen, , 2001, Korean (Hayashi and Yoon, 2009), and Japanese (Hayashi and Yoon, 2009;Iwasaki, 1997;Tanaka, 2010). This article builds on these studies by describing how English-speaking participants use acknowledgment tokens, assessments, and other closure-implicative objects in managing the practical issues related to lapses in conversational interaction.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Other conversation analytic studies have also examined repeats by different speakers (e.g., Couper-Kuhlen, 1996;Hellerman, 2003;Schegloff, 1996;Sorjonen, 1996;Tarplee, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repeats with a similar function have been identified in English (Jefferson 1972;Quirk et al 1972;Robinson and Kevoe-Feldman 2010;Sidnell 2010;Robinson 2013), German (Selting 1996), Finnish (Sorjonen 1996), Chinese (Wu 2006), and Russian (Bolden 2009). Benjamin and Walker (2013) analyse a similar repeat practice in English, the function of which is to convey that the target utterance is "wrong and in need of correction" (p. 108).…”
Section: The Role Of Intonation In Marking the Function Of Repeatsmentioning
confidence: 76%