2000
DOI: 10.1007/10722028_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Reconstruction of Algebraic Numbers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the residue class field k is finite we can use the algorithms of Berlekamp (1970), Cantor and Zassenhaus (1981), or one of the many improvements of these algorithms, Kaltofen and Shoup (1998) for example. If k is the completion of a function field over a number field then polynomials over k can be factored using the algorithms for factoring polynomials over number fields by Trager (1976), Pohst (1999), Roblot (2000), or Fieker and Friedrichs (2000).…”
Section: Reducibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the residue class field k is finite we can use the algorithms of Berlekamp (1970), Cantor and Zassenhaus (1981), or one of the many improvements of these algorithms, Kaltofen and Shoup (1998) for example. If k is the completion of a function field over a number field then polynomials over k can be factored using the algorithms for factoring polynomials over number fields by Trager (1976), Pohst (1999), Roblot (2000), or Fieker and Friedrichs (2000).…”
Section: Reducibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choosing T 2 yields smaller bounds (only slightly so, provided (ω i ) is LLL-reduced), but would force us to compute embeddings to a huge accuracy to avoid stability problems during the LLL reduction. This idea is due to Fieker and Friedrichs [12]. Remark 3.14.…”
Section: Boundsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In many applications, it is advantageous to use non-Archimedean embeddings K → K ⊗ Q Q p = ⊕ p|p K p which is isomorphic to Q n p as a Q p -vector space. This cancels rounding errors, as well as stability problems in the absence of divisions by p. In some applications (e.g., automorphisms [1], factorization of polynomials [3,18]), a single embedding K → K p is enough, provided an upper bound for α is available.…”
Section: Karim Belabasmentioning
confidence: 99%