2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2017.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On randomization-based causal inference for matched-pair factorial designs

Abstract: Under the potential outcomes framework, we introduce matched-pair factorial designs, and propose the matched-pair estimator of the factorial effects. We also calculate the randomizationbased covariance matrix of the matched-pair estimator, and provide the "Neymanian" estimator of the covariance matrix.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(39 reference statements)
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We adopt some materials from Dasgupta et al () and Lu (, ) to review the Neymanian causal inference framework for 2 K factorial designs. To maintain consistency, we inherit the set of notations from Lu ().…”
Section: Neymanian Inference For Factorial Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adopt some materials from Dasgupta et al () and Lu (, ) to review the Neymanian causal inference framework for 2 K factorial designs. To maintain consistency, we inherit the set of notations from Lu ().…”
Section: Neymanian Inference For Factorial Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, h K ) is the jth treatment combination z j . To further illustrate the construction of the model matrix, we adopt the example in Lu (2016). Example 1.…”
Section: Randomization Inference For 2 K Factorial Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, randomization-based inference is applicable to the finite-population setting, and therefore may be more reasonable in practice (e.g., Miller 2006;Lu et al 2015). For more discussion on the comparison and reconciliation of randomization-based and regression-based inferences for 2 K factorial designs, see Lu (2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its long tradition in the context of treatment-control experiments [Splawa- Neyman (1990), Neyman (1935), Kempthorne (1952), Imbens and Rubin (2015), Ding and Dasgupta (2016)], randomization-based inference remains an almost uncharted field when it comes to factorial experiments. The recent works of Dasgupta, Pillai and Rubin (2015), Espinosa, Dasgupta and Rubin (2016) and Lu (2016) are, to the best of our knowledge, the only literature along this line, each documenting improvements of randomization-based analysis over existing modelbased methods in the context of multi-factor completely randomized designs. Extending their methods to split-plot designs is a promising next step.…”
Section: Introduction Factorial Experiments Originally Developed Inmentioning
confidence: 99%