1929
DOI: 10.2307/2332563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Racial Differences in Stature Long Bone Regression Formulae, with Special Reference to Stature Reconstruction Formulae for the Chinese

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
34
1
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
34
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…D u pertuis and H a d d en [1951] suggest two or more long bones for stature calculation, leg bones being better than arm bones. Breitinger [1937] worked on Germans, T elkk a [1950,1951] worked on Finns, M endes-C orrea [1932] worked on Portuguese, and Stevenson [1929] worked on Chinese male bones.…”
Section: Review O F Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…D u pertuis and H a d d en [1951] suggest two or more long bones for stature calculation, leg bones being better than arm bones. Breitinger [1937] worked on Germans, T elkk a [1950,1951] worked on Finns, M endes-C orrea [1932] worked on Portuguese, and Stevenson [1929] worked on Chinese male bones.…”
Section: Review O F Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 6.3 gives the difference in stature estimation based on comparisons between humeral and femoral lengths, and that based on comparisons between femoral and tibial lengths. In terms of humeralfemoral comparisons Stevenson (1929) andFijii's (1960) formulae show the smallest differences. Examining estimates based on femoral and tibial lengths, Sangvichien et al's (1985) equations provide the smallest differences, more so even than the humeral-femoral comparisons, and are deemed the most appropriate functions for estimating Man Bac stature from the tibia and femur.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…There is little sexual dimorphism in either index (brachial: males 81.6 females 78.1, crural: males 85.5, females 83.9). Difference of stature estimation based on comparisons between humeral and femoral lengths Stevenson (1929) 4. Mean stature difference (humerus -femur' 2 6 3 9 2 8…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, 29 regression formulae were applied on femoral length. Most of these equations yield living stature, but some give corpse length (DUPERTUIS & HADDEN, 1951;GENOVÉS, 1967;STEVENSON, 1929;TELKKÄ, 1950). From the latter estimates, as recommended by TROTTER and GLESER (1952, p. 492), 2.5 cm were subtracted for comparison.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%